Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Neha's Vision Tutorial Classes

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Neha's Vision Tutorial Classes


Undersourced and probably promotional per WP:NOTADVERTISING. Sheldybett (talk) 23:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Either reject and leave for G13, or evaluate your "probably" hunch and tag G13 if promotional. "Probably promotional" is applicable to every draft.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Based on the submitter's history, probably not promotional, and only submitted once, but no credible claim of significance. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - No, not every draft is probably promotional. I accept some.  Almost every draft at MFD is probably promotional.  Robert McClenon (talk) 06:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete It's been reduced to a non-notable unsourced business stub that doesn't even meet WP:WITHIN to redirect to any useful article. It's not a regular school.   AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 04:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * AngusWOOF, isn't WP:WITHIN a reason to redirect, not delete? Indeed, a reason to WP:BOLDly redirect?  Deletion means that the author's browser will take them to a deletion log, redirect means that they'll go to the location in mainspace where we think they are interested in contributing.  If they are a little bit serious, they may be interested in the past edits.  Removing access to their past edits is unwelcoming.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:58, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, if this were a regular school, I would redirect to the district or the community, and use WP:WITHIN in case it could be developed into a future article, but as it stands, this appears to be just a non-notable local tutorial business. If I offered to tutor people and had a name to the "business", I could write a sentence like that and submit it to Wikipedia.   AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 14:29, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.