Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nikhil Jindal 22

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. ‑Scottywong | [spill the beans] || 01:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Nikhil Jindal 22

 * – (View MfD)

Clear autobiography. I am not sure if it meets G11 (if it does then please speedily delete the draft). Train of Knowledge (Talk) 05:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ignore. MfD is not for funnelling worthless useless drafts. G13 was made for this stuff.  Only come to MfD over a draft if it violations something at WP:NOT, or is being tendentiously resubmitted. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Doesn't need deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * keep No valid reason to delete that I can see. Does not look likely to be approved as an article, not indication of notability. Still one might be added. Not even close to G11, by the way. "Autobiography" is not a reason for deletion, neither in draft space nor in article space. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 21:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per SmokeyJoe and DESiegel. No need to deal with pages such as these in this venue. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.