Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nisha tanwar's first artical

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Will provide a copy of the deleted text for merging into Expected value if anyone asks. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nisha tanwar's first artical


I'm not sure if this is useful, true, or junk. The edit summary to create it does not give me confidence. Math people - is there somewhere this should be merged or used or it just abandoned junk? Legacypac (talk) 07:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Why would you want to merge suspicious and unsourced material anywhere? I wouldn't. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:12, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into Expected value, which is what the draft seems to be about.&thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 01:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough content to make a merge worthwhile. And yes, that edit summary is... just wow. VQuakr (talk) 04:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.