Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Noble Party of Minnesota

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ping for SALT if recreated. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Noble Party of Minnesota


Nominator's rationale: Please salt the draft and article title Noble Party of Minnesota. The party was a non-notable party and there is no way to allow the draft creator (also had the same name to the party creator, ) to improve it to pass GNG. No google result. Matthew_hk  t  c  10:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Matthew_hk   t  c  10:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  Matthew_hk   t  c  10:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The user's edit history suggests nonsense, and digging persuades me that it is only probably nonsense. Can someone comment on he author's deleted contributions?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Digging the google search result of the arrest of "Theron Preston Washington" and Minneapolis mayoral election, 2017, he is a "politician" that get zero vote, the party did "existed" but it just very not notable and the user just use wikipedia as a webhost. Matthew_hk   t  c  07:53, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I was leaning to agreeing to delete, except that I am also worried by yourself? Why are you asking for a never-created title to be salted?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The draft was recreated, and the user keep on asking why it was deleted, which indicate he will recreate the draft. Also once he got enough edit count, he can "recreate" the article or move the draft to article namespace. Matthew_hk   t  c  10:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don’t completely understand, but is sounds like it needs deletion for some set of reasons. Preemptive Salting is usually not granted, you may have to watch the redlink. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete vanity spam Legacypac (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:49, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.