Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Norco (film)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. WP:CRYSTAL - drafts need to have some chance of making it to mainspace, either because the film is actually being made and we are prepping an article pending relesae, or because it has become so notable as vaporware that we should have an article about its total failure to arrive. Neither of these things is true in this case. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Norco (film)

 *  J 947(c) (m) 03:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Abandoned 2015 draft about a planned film. Legacypac (talk) 19:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete If this were in mainspace, it would fail for WP:NFF. No objecttion to re-creation if/when this moves into actual filming. Hasteur (talk) 01:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. WP:NFF is a notability criterion, which does not apply in draft space per WP:NMFD. Plausible topic. VQuakr (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * With respect, IF and when the film actually has moved forward the draft can be resurrected. At this point it's in Development hell and might never be produced. Hasteur (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 19:08, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * With respect, you seem to misunderstand the purpose of this. For all we know, the film could reside in development hell indefinitely.  How many films are "announced" and never actually proceed into filming? Hasteur (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * yes, they could remain in development hell indefinitely. That doesn't make the topic implausible for a draft. The retention criteria are different in draft space then they are in mainspace. VQuakr (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * You are mistaking Draft space for a shadow encyclopedia of topics that do not qualify for the encyclopedia. Fundamental misunderstanding and continued pushing of this point will eventually end badly for your ability to edit around MfD. Legacypac (talk) 18:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Huh? VQuakr (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 03:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, the existence of the subject fails WP:V, noting that the announced commencement did not happen. While in this state, the proper forum is http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4778474/  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The nominator, Legacypac, should be advised to base deletion rationales on points in the policy WP:NOT, and these do not include "abandoned" or "planned".  "Planned but then didn't happen as planned" is a good reason to delete in favour of coverage at IMDB, per WP:CRYSTAL.  Procedurally, the nomination violated WP:NMFD, a better nomination that didn't could have been written. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.