Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nouvelles en double helice

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Nouvelles en double helice


This draft both appears to consist of original research and philosophical speculation, and does not provide sufficient context to be informative. The author is expanding it without improving it. It is unlikely ever to become an encyclopedic article. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unlikely acceptable. SwisterTwister   talk  05:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. /wiae   /tlk  02:13, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.