Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ORLAB Analytics

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:ORLAB Analytics


This has been declined seven times now, time to pull the plug methinks.  SITH   (talk)   15:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete wasting afc reviewer time Legacypac (talk) 19:35, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and I have a few comments and questions. First, this illustrates the need for better instructions on the use of Reject.  The reviewers, consistently with how Rejection is defined, did not Reject because there isn't enough information to be sure that the company isn't notable.  A clarification is in order.  Second, I am reasonably certain that the proponent is a blocked user with a conflict of interest.  Third, who is the blocked user?  Delete.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.