Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Oghenetega Efedede

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  withdrawn-- is not yet ripe for MFD. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 11:18, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Oghenetega Efedede


Declined CSD, I don't see any way this will pass WP:BLP / WP:GNG. His company page (created by same editor) was deleted as a G11. A WP:BEFORE also did not came out anything notable. Maybe SPA / COI Quek157 (talk) 21:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - It is fairly dry, i.e. not promotional, especially after I made to it. As notability is not a primary concern here, and the draft will likely be deleted per G13 in 6 months, why take any action right now? It is not being constantly resubmitted to AfC (in fact it has yet to be), nor have any attempts to move it into the mainspace been mentioned here. If the creator tries any of those things, maybe they will learn from it and became a constructive contributor; all deleting the draft here is likely to do is frustrate them. The fledging statements of subject X has a job, owns Y company, was born in this place at this time, attended school, along with providing a brief description of Y company seem to be, if true, basic facts that do not rise to the level of content that would warrant conflict of interest concerns. Maybe someone will find appropriate sourcing or maybe it does not exist, but that is irrelevant at this venue. —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 22:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to note that I can't compare this to Draft:Cape Music Entertainment Television (CMETV). Maybe it was worse and this is a step in the right direction. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 22:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - I do not like autobiographies, but there hasn't been a reason presented to delete (and speedy was declined). Wait until the author is a nuisance and then try MFD again.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comment above. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 15:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn - not knowing that MFD we don't care about notablity (which we should, and discussed at RFC) --Quek157 (talk) 16:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment prior to closing AS proposed, and trout me if I'm wrong, MFD is the remedy after 3 declines. The purpose of Draft Space is, after all, to incubate articles. We also, in terms of sourcing, must be wary of systemic bias about subjects for whom it may be harder to locate sourcing. As to applying A7 in draft space, which I agree with, this draft does assert significance.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 11:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.