Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Oliver Isaacs

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Oliver Isaacs


Delete based on result of this AfD from 15 days ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oliver_Isaacs I can't tell if it's a recreation of deleted content but an Admin can look and comment. Legacypac (talk) 20:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment I created this draft to fix up the errors of the article. It's still in the workings, and I'm still editing it. Thanks! FiendYT   ★
 * Delete as a copyright failure, a gross attribution failure of the deleted article. Or get the deleted article undeleted and request a History Merge.  Invite the closer User:DGG to comment and consider fixing the situation.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Fixing the attribution is one of the dilemma with deleted articles, but there are ways to deal with it. (I am personally very likely to mess up a history merge, based on sad experience) The content is a slight improvement--some of the namedropping has been removed.
 * The real question is whether it makes any sense to rewrite an article on a borderline notable internet celebrity that was based on undeclared apid promotional editing   DGG ( talk ) 06:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.