Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Omotola Yusuf

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 03:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Omotola Yusuf


Abandoned page on low profile individual Legacypac (talk) 02:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. These abandoned drafts need to come under a relaxed WP:CSD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Plenty more just like them. 2500 short soldier bios included. Legacypac (talk) 05:57, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Be more careful there. Soldier stubs will not be uncontroversial.  Verifiable soldier stubs should be merged into soldier list subarticles of the war they served.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * all unsourced. Every one of hundreds checked fails WP:SOLDIER. Hundreds previously deleted one by one, then we wacked a thousand drafts in one go. Than another small batch by date near this MfD.  About 1500 to go now. I can't believe one editor put all these together without thinking about the fact most of his mainspaced pages have been deleted. Why even put up a page that says nothing more enlightening than "Joe German was a private in WWII." Legacypac (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * "unsourced" is a critically important bit of information in these discussions, please don't forget to state it when it applies. Do you come across an appreciable number of sourced old soldiers?  "Old unsourced drafts" might be a better next step of broadening G13? Note that WP:SOLDIER speaks to Wikipedia-notability, whether the topic should have a stand alone article, and is silent on the possibility of merging the information.  Unsourced is a bigger concern. One editor?  It might be helpful in the long run for you to briefly record these observations.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * One editor. Other than a handful in mainspace, no sources I've seen. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Mad7744 Legacypac (talk) 09:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. no prospect whatsoever of an article.  DGG ( talk ) 07:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above, no prospect whatsoever in becoming an article. Also per . --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.