Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:OpenSpy.net

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. There is no chance in "administrator overhead" once the MFD has started and "administrator overhead" has never been a policy consideration at AFD or in any other deletion discussion. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:OpenSpy.net

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 17:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 17:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

WP:NOTWEBHOST; google searches reveal zero reliable secondary sources, and it's highly unlikely a private game server will ever become notable. ~ RobTalk 14:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Good faith drafting, not promotion or webhosting. Just blank, do not hide the user contributions.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, pointless blanking something that'll never be revisited again, Better off deleted IMHO). – Davey 2010 Talk 19:13, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Now that we are here, yes, but deletion was not worth its administrative overhead. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Well I think so far all of the MFDs I've !voted Delete in have been deleted instead of blanked so I would say it was worth the "administrative overhead", The creator was an IP so I'd imagine they've gained a new IP address ... either way the article won't ever be seen nor edited after this MFD ... then there's the problem of this could easily be vandalized and no one would ever know which is why deletion is better than blanking. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:52, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * SmokeyJoe means that we all had to review and comment on the nomination and an admin had to assess our comments, close the discussion, and delete the page. The fact everybody played their roles does not make it any less wasteful, given that deletion does not accomplish anything that blanking (which takes 1 non-admin 15 seconds) does not. A2soup (talk) 17:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah I'm well aware what he means ....., Admins see "Delete" and delete it simple as that. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.