Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Operation Identification

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  21:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Operation Identification

 * – (View MfD)

Operation identification has turned in to operation spot the sock. This problem child of an article has been edited by three different socks now. Unfortunately it was created before the puppeteer was issued a block. There's been no significant edits other than by the socks. The subject might be notable, but this looks like a case of WP:TNT. Article seems riddled with WP:OR and lacks the focus, tone, or WP:NPOV needed. If someone wants to right the ship, by all means go for it, but I don't see much that is salvageable and it might be time to put this rabid beast to sleep. Edit: The page creator and sock master was initially banned for being a UPE, there's likely WP:COATRACK issues too with this article that I'm not seeing clearly at this hour. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - TNT is the best approach here IMO. The creator was hired to create this page per off-wiki evidence and constantly using sock accounts to recover their work so, I'm not interested to help them in this. If the subject is notable, someone will write an article about it sooner or later. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 07:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as per nominator. Consider Extended-Confirmed Protection so that a neutral editor can re-create, but letting the suckpoppets suck on some poppets.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.