Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Origami (Shakira and Ozuna song)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  13:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Origami (Shakira and Ozuna song)

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Another hoax article/draft by a user who has been blocked indefinitely and there are no reliable sources showing that it's even real. Erick (talk) 16:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - The lack of sources is not in itself reason to delete a draft. Not a G5, because not blocked at the time of creation.  The combination of problems is reason to delete.  This fails verifiability, and probably will never be verified.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ItsMario97 (talk) 19:23, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion - there is no official confirmation of the album Deseo Inherente, from his track-list or from this song "Origami". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Julián Martínez (talk • contribs) 21:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 08:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be a hoax.—Alalch E. 23:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. The content of the article may well be untrue, but it has been widely publicised on social media and the like. It is therefore perfectly likely that this draft was created by someone who had read about it on the internet, and believed what they read, in which case the article is not a hoax. There may or may not be good reasons for deleting this draft, but it being a hoax is not one of them. JBW (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You're right that this is probably not a hoax that originated on Wikipedia in a strict sense that the creator came up with something false and wanted to trick readers into believing that it's real, but the original content about this found on the internet appears to be a hoax.—Alalch E. 07:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per above. CastJared (talk) 18:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.