Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:PMG Employment Consultants

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. G11 (advert) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:46, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:PMG Employment Consultants


Conflict of interest draft that appears to be about both a company and its founder, not about one or the other.

If a neutral editor wants to work on the person or the company, they can make that offer within seven days. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. COI is not a reason for deletion. If not G11-eligible, it is not offensive enough to need deletion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - to me, it is a G11. A promotional article with a single source to the topic's own page, authored by an SPA who almost certainly has an undeclared conflict of interest. KJP1 (talk) 07:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * (Re-) userfy and let it be for now? Someone who is new to wikipedia wrote, in one edit, a not very good draft about a company where they seem to have a COI. They didn't source it well, and in a woefully unready state submitted it at AFC, for which it was clearly unready. In about one hour since creation, it was in quick succession moved into draft space, rejected as a submitted draft, and nominator for deletion at MFD -- all by the same editor. While each of these actions is justified and doubtless well-intentioned, the aggregate impact is pretty bitey. Why not instead just leave the "article" in the creator's user space, advise him to read up on COI, WP:CORP, notability, sourcing, etc? Yes, with 90%+ likelihood I expect this "article" will never see the light of day, but let's not go overboard in a WP:BITEy way. Martinp (talk) 19:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete amazing quick response to a request to move this to mainspace when some drafts wait 8 weeks for a review. The move to Draft is standard practice on AfC submissions and good for a variety of reasons. Prompt deletion of Spam sends the right message. Legacypac (talk) 02:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.