Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pandonicism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Speedy delete as promotional. 331dot (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Pandonicism


Per WP:A11: this topic is obviously invented by the article's author, a user named Pandonic. Was tagged G3 but the article makes a credible claim that the philosophy actually exists. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete previous versions made it clear he invented this recently and no one else cares about it. I've requested salting. There is another related title Legacypac (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt This is a hoax. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 20:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have bundled the two drafts that are copies. The author is spamming draft space with multiple copies.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete both as made up, and because spamming with multiple copies is disruptive. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Somebody rediscovered Nietzsche and thinks he's really profound. This is not WP:INDISCRIMINATE compliant. Simonm223 (talk) 20:30, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete My CSD G3 for hoax was declined, but it's still a made up neologism. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:41, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Sarcastic Question for User:Simonm223 - Do you mean that the author rediscovered Nietzsche and thinks that Nietzsche is profound, or that the author rediscovered Nietzsche and thinks that the author is profound? Nietzsche was profound, just disturbingly profound.  You probably meant the latter.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Sincere answer I was suggesting that the author of this article series, with their vague "self mastery" discussion seems like every boy in 1st year general arts who finds a dog-eared copy of The Antichrist or Thus Spake Zarathustra in their school library and suddenly decides they are a very serious intellectual. Sorry that my own haste in sarcasm made my point muddied. Simonm223 (talk) 03:01, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - No apology required. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Maybe a block is necessary. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * delete per aboveAh, remember sophomore philosophy or humanities? Those first heady readings of Nietsche or Goethe? I fear that this is a sophomoric attempt at sonority that has been destined to fall. Doch erinnere dich-- was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärkerLet us hop upon our train and steam off into the distance.  Dloh Cier ekim    (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.