Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pandunia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Pandunia


Per the results of Articles for deletion/Pandunia just 9 months ago Legacypac (talk) 05:55, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Saw this one a couple days ago, almost thought it was a hoax until looking at the sources, which most of are primary or from GitHub. CoolSkittle  (talk) 06:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Topic got a good review at the AfD. We should endorse that work. Legacypac (talk) 06:08, 26 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete in favour of International auxiliary language. If Pandunia is not worth a mention at that article, it is certainly not worth a standalone article.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Good find Legacypac (talk) 06:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Was straightforward. International auxiliary language is mentioned as apparently the only link to relevance in the opening sentence, and  even edited that page immediately before drafting.  I wish I know who to re-work the AfC newcomer trap/instructions to discourage newcomers from creating orphan new topics.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * But that would not satisfy their desire to get their pet topic its own page on Wikipedia. Legacypac (talk) 07:12, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That's correct. Their pet topic may or may not be worth including.  We have to trust that the watchers of that page will respond to an inappropriate addition.  The page has 184 watchers, so I think it is a fair bet.  Newcomers with pet topics are always better off to engage with the community in mainspace than to waste time creating fantasy draft pages that will never be accepted, with no one else watching except for when they hit the submit button.  A watcher of International auxiliary language is much more likely to give an informed incisive response to the newcomer than we can.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete in accordance with the result of the AFD. If the language becomes more widely used, Deletion Review is available.  Until then, no need to keep in draft space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.