Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Patty Gobbler

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Patty Gobbler

 * – (View MfD)

No point to this draft. I'm not sure if this is a joke or what it is. Adam9007 (talk) 21:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Unworthy of MfD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - surely could have been a speedy? In any case, delete. --IWI (talk) 11:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy for what? It's not a nonsense, a test page, or an attack page, and there's no evidence of vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 16:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Multiple things are wrong with this stub, none serious enough to warrant speedy, so delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, but really? Surely this could have just been allowed to die a peaceful death via G13. We're spending far more time dealing with this draft than the author spent writing it, and to what end? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, but with Extraordinary Writ's caveats. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per Writ and I'll repeat their beautifully crafted paragraph "We're spending far more time dealing with this draft than the author spent writing it". – Davey 2010 Talk 19:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.