Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Paul Kuniholm Pauper

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 12:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Paul Kuniholm Pauper


Not notable, advertisement, written like an essay. JustBerry (talk) 21:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I've boiled and distilled the article down to one salient sentence and the exhibition history, which should eliminate any "advertisement" bias ascribed by JustBerry. Thank you for your approval1stArtHistorian (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Subject is notable, if just based solely on his inclusion in the Tenth Northwest Biennial, listed in the Exhibition History. 1stArtHistorian (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Pro-forma., AFC's purpose is to help submissions get to the point that they can be promoted to mainspace, of course the submission is going to be needing more improvement. WP:G13 is the CSD that revolves around AFC stale submissions.  Please review the purpose of WP:DRAFT and WP:AFC. I don't see any of the other CSD rationale as appicable, so it makes sense to give this article space Hasteur (talk) 00:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - the editor is obviously working on improving the draft. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 02:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.