Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pdfs

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Pdfs

 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)

Empty drafts. I can't even tell what the some of these titles are supposed to refer to. Others give the impression that they're not serious drafts. Adam9007 (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all so long as they don't receive any genuine attempts to create an article while discussion is ongoing. —  csc -1 04:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep All - They are blank drafts, and might expand and submit them. I encounter blank drafts at AFC sometimes; blank drafts are declined but not rejected, and are sometimes just an error by the author.  These have not been submitted.  No need to delete.  Robert McClenon (talk) 06:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all - If the IPs were serious about editing here they wouldn't create a blank draft and then disappear for a week/eternity. Personally don't see a point in blanking drafts when they'll never be improved and or edited. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Pdfs, redirect already exists for PDFs and entering "pdfs" in search will redirect there. The editor can re-create this if there is an organization called PDFS. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.