Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pelt Ball

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Pelt Ball


I can't find the right CSD criterion. But it is evident this will remain in draft for foreseeable future if not deleted. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral - There isn't a CSD criterion in draft space for this fluff. It hasn't done any harm.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:26, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTMADEUP - I am usually pretty lenient if drafts have even a minute chance of being or becoming notable but it is so unlikely in this case, and since we are already discussing it here, we might as well be rid of it. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 18:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Aditionally, this is the only edit by an editor name ; I could see an argument for G11. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 18:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The xsd criterion would be madeup. We should not tolerate this sort of nonsense.  DGG ( talk ) 06:30, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, Madeup CSD only applies to Articles. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:00, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * DGG is a supporter at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:19, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete promotion unsuitably sourced. So tagged.  Significant opposition to A11 and A7 is draftspace is that where it matters G11 already applies. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.