Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pertinent application of law

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Pertinent application of law


Also
 * which has same content.

Draft written by a now blocked sockpuppeteer, based entirely on his own writing. Appears to be a personal essay. Guy (Help!) 07:55, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Will not be an article. CoolSkittle  (talk) 08:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I have added another draft that is the same by another sockpuppet. This isn't G5 because the master account wasn't blocked at the time of creation, but it is a good general principle that we should discourage sockpuppetry, whether or not it is block evasion at the time.  We should also discourage the spamming of multiple copies of drafts.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.