Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Petaa

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. Deleted per WP:G10 Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:50, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Petaa

 * – (View MfD)

This is an entirely negative draft containing controversies about PETA that duplicates an article already in mainspace (PETA covers the group's controversies already) and has unfounded allegations not backed up by the sources.  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  03:49, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - If not considered an attack page, close enough to one for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: The author can contribute to PETA. Otherwise, this is just an attack page. --MarioGom (talk) 22:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak speedy delete Already deleted once per G10, though not defamatory this time. But this one is much more polemical than legitimate "Criticism of" articles. G3 may apply if G10 does not. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 04:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.