Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Peter Anthony

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete both. MER-C 08:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Peter Anthony


Last edited in November of 2014 in which it was created by a "one day in the sun" editor whose only other contribution was to make the same Non-notable Person posting in their userspace sandbox. This page fails BLP as it does not have a single cited fact in the draft. The userspace sanbox version contains one link to the subject's tumblr that doesn't have any reliable sources compliant content. For the combination of problems (staleness, Non-notable BLP, Unreferenced BLP, creator gone) I believe this should be deleted Hasteur (talk) 23:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and also delete User:Onpar 22/sandbox, the same thing. Yes, "PeterIsFunny", but it is blatant promotion.  Refer author to Alternative outlets.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.