Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pinky Campbell

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | speak _ 06:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Pinky Campbell


Only references available are a couple from 2012/2013. The rest are only film lists that she features in, but not about her. Originally there was mostly IMDb references. Also has been up for AfD here - Articles for deletion/Pinky Campbell Mjs1991 (talk) 22:06, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Has the author been asked about conflict of interest? They are an SPA who is editing like a paid editor.  They appear to be trying to get this back into article space both by a move (which could have been deleted) and via draft; both permitted, but doing it both ways at once is gaming the system.  They have already been to AFD.  No indication that this draft is likely to be approved.  Just delete it and salt it as ECP in both draft and article space so that a neutral editor can work if they choose to do so.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – This is likely undisclosed paid editing, and the repeated attempts to create this article are getting disruptive. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 02:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment -  I'm new to Wikipedia and I am still learning thus there was a desperate attempt to complete this article I even asked one reviewer to help me with these but he declined my request and I'm not getting pay of any kind for this I'm doing this as a favor and I have even seen some bio with just two references and this person have done some big films during 2000's and is legitimate so I'm just asking you to help me with this one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krohitk (talk • contribs) 03:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment There's no need to make a "desperate attempt" to create an article. You have plenty of time to create something in Draft space or possibly start it in your sandbox.--Mjs1991 (talk) 03:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. No valid reasons to delete. The driving AfD reason was WP:TOOSOON, which is a reason to use draftspace, the opposite of a reason to delete from draftspace. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Question for User:Krohitk - Why were you desperately attempting to complete the article? I know of one plausible answer, which you have denied, which is that you are desperate to get paid.  Otherwise, are you familiar with no deadline?  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I don’t think XfD is right for behavioural questions. I’ve asked at User_talk:Krohitk. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:48, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Still not getting paid a single penny for this and I was not familiar with no deadline just looked on it I don't know most of the policies. there was no deadline instead I made a commitment that I can get it done like in a month if I knew there are this kind of policies I wouldn't have made such commitments.  I have replyed to your questions on my talk page.Krohitk (talk) 04:56, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Question - You "made a commitment that I can get it done like in a month". To whom?  Why?Robert McClenon (talk) 00:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Answer - to my friend who is in contact with pinky, my friend asked me to find a guy who can do wiki article so I told her I'm learning wiki maybe I can do it in month or so because I'm still learning I thought month would be enough, but I was clearly wrong.Krohitk (talk) 16:35, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.