Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Planet Eclipse

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Planet Eclipse


Three different reviewers have found this topic not notable. The creator objects. Bringing this for wider discussion. I don't think this is a suitable topic so I'd like to see it deleted rather than continue to the submit decline round and round. Legacypac (talk) 20:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - My comments saying that the references are not independent and saying that the draft is promotional are in the draft. I don't know exactly what User:Legacypac means by a "suitable topic", but this draft is not in shape for article space, and two other reviewers agree with me.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Question for User:GI44HK - Do you have an affiliation with Planet Eclipse? Please read the conflict of interest policy.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - The author refers to another article which they think is similar, and that argument is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is listed as not a good argument to use at XFD (or for AFC). Robert McClenon (talk) 22:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - The author's comment that "The sport is in its infancy" is WP:TOOSOON. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I find the page promotional and don't see the coverage necessary for WP:CORPDEPTH. I don't think the amount of time paintball has been around matters at all. Paintball is not a new sport. The question is should this draft be deleted - I believe it is going no where after many months, so a decision at MfD is the way to go here as the creator disagrees so let's have a discussion. Legacypac (talk) 23:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Since I haven't said it yet, and since the author hasn't addressed the conflict of interest question,
 * Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 14:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral I somewhat agree with the above comments but I don't think we should delete yet. Maybe give it some time? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 06:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.