Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Plotagon's Jared: The Movie

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  00:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Plotagon's Jared: The Movie

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

After several declines and a reject along with a warning they continue to resubmit the draft without improvement. Also, recommend salting. S0091 (talk) 01:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt, there is a clear conflict of interest, where the article's creator is also the film's creator - clearly self promotion - fails WP:NFILM and is never likely to satisfy Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 02:09, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt, as above. --Bduke (talk) 02:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt . Creator has been blocked for disruptive editing.  --Finngall talk  03:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Striking the "salt" part of my !vote per SmokeyJoe. Not inclined to apologize, though, for not taking the time to parse whether a person editing disruptively is an actual child or merely being childish.  --Finngall talk  18:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt per nom. Everything is original research. Existence does not equal notability. Wikipedia is not the place for this article. The article should also be creation-protected after deletion as well. AKK  700  17:43, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - This has been declined 9 times and rejected twice by multiple reviewers. Resubmission after rejection is normally sufficient to delete.  This may be competing for a record that we don't want.  No opinion as to salting because any suckpoppets will tweak the title anyway.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * What a miserable reflection on this project. Not one person involved with repeatedly rejecting this draft, slapping template warnings on the author's talk page, or ultimately blocking him entirely, managed to notice that they were obviously dealing with a child and make an attempt to speak to him appropriately on his talk page. The comments above are like robots talking to each other. —  Scott  •  talk  18:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Anything involving Plotagon, Goanimate, or any other "make your own movie tool" is likely done by a child anyway. They should have policies explained to them, rather than being banned for not understanding a bunch of editors who have yet to explain the issue to him. Not to mention the only warnings were a templated message with the blue nuvola icon (Which he is likely to just wave aside anyway as a bot message) and a message full of very verbose language. ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  17:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Do not salt. This case does not meet Protection policy for WP:SALT, this is not the right forum for requesting protection (and people here are not conversant with the relevant policy), and SALTing in Draftspace is contrary to the purpose of draftspace, and SALTing if it has any effect it will be to teach how to evade SALT. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete; do not salt. Salting only encourages sockpuppets to find new titles, where a page won't show up as having been deleted before. In mainspace it's sometimes a necessary evil but is almost never justified in draftspace. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 12:49, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.