Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Polisario's connection to terrorist organizations

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete per WP:CSD. ✗ plicit  00:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Polisario's connection to terrorist organizations

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Unsourced propaganda noise. This does not belong here and is not a serious attempt at an NPOV encyclopedia article. ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - This seems to be an attempt at passing POV as an article. Even if it had sources, the language, the tone and claims are obviously a violation of NPOV as it seems the entire intent to discredit, not inform.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 09:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, if it appears to violate the guidelines it can be deleted. I just wanted to list the connections between terrorist groups and the Polisario because I thought it might be interesting. It's just incomplete, I wanted to include a few sources and rewrite it if necessary. but well then I'll just leave it... Vogelman29 (talk) 10:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * We aren't here to publish random things that someone find interesting. As I said at ANI, I don't think you fully understand what an encyclopedia is, and what Wikipedia is.  It isn't a free for all for publishing anything you want.  I will consider your comment as good enough for CSD:G7, although it will need to be a different admin to do it, since I've commented enough on it.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 10:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, as I said, I thought it would be appropriate to talk about this topic. As I said, the draft is incomplete and not yet published. I think every page is checked. And at the latest when I want to publish it, an admin would probably have intervened. As I said it, I would have worded a lot of things differently and also mentioned sources. But if you as an admin say that it should be deleted now even though I'm not finished yet, then I accept that. Then I'll try another topic. :)) Vogelman29 (talk) 13:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Dennis Brown Is this in the Arab-Israeli conflict area. Created by someone without ECP. Doug Weller  talk 19:11, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I stopped doing Arb/AE enforcement since it changed over to CT and I haven't brushed up on the new rules. Before that I was active, but I was in the middle of huge life change, didn't have time to learn yet another thing.  So I'm not sure what can be done other than what I've done.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 23:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * User:Doug Weller, User:Dennis Brown, do you think we should add ECR violations to WP:DEL-REASON? SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * , that would make a great deal of sense, since if they are violating ECR, it is not controversial to delete an article, or draft space edit. I'm not sure we need to worry about sandbox or user space, but for any other space, yes.  That would make short work of an obvious problem, even if it is rare.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 08:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I might word it "any article that was created in violation of any existing policy, including EC or by a banned user", situations where there really doesn't need to be a discussion. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 08:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @SmokeyJoe Yes, even if in a sense it's redundant. Doug Weller  talk 08:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom Drowssap  SMM  14:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 13:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Catfurball (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I have started a discussion on the CSD talk page that is relevant to this discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion. Participation is appreciated.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 09:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.