Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Portal:Carrie Underwood

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 14:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Portal:Carrie Underwood


This is the only "draft portal", moved there a couple days ago by. A prior discussion at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 73 concluded that that's not a good idea to move portals to Draftspace. As for this portal in particular, the Portal author hasn't been active in several years, so I don't think we should be holding our breath in anticipation that the author is going to come back to finish this. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, this specific one per nom. (though I'm not sure why you can't wait 6 months for G13), but to your broader point I am not sure I would interpret discussion by two editors in a Withdrawn RfC on a different topic as "a prior discussion . . . concluded that. . . "; in fact, several (i.e., more than 2) active portal editors have concluded the opposite: that the no-indexed draftspace is precisely the correct namespace for preparing multi-page portals (as was done with Draft:Portal:Prostitution and subpages), until such time as they are ready for their "promotion" to the Portalspace to be considered. I am aware of no policy limiting draftspace to articles, as the number of Book:, Portal:, Template: and Wikipedia: drafts located there attests. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:34, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - If this were finished, it would still be another single-performer portal. As it is, it is an ugly sea of red.  Portals should not be in draft space, which is for draft articles, because the AFC scripts are likely to make bean salad out of draft portals if the reviewer tries to deal with them in the usual ways.  This doesn't belong in draft space and it doesn't belong in portal space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just a long-abandoned sea of redlinks. --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 20:00, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: nip it in the bud now, this isn't going to pass WP:POG.   SITH   (talk)   12:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.