Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Professional Video Monitors

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Professional Video Monitors

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Rejected draft. Tagged for speedy deletion under G11, which I don't feel is appropriate (it is not "exclusively promotional" and in fact lists some drawbacks of the product), yet searching turns up mostly sales pages and product listings rather than reliable sources. Let's make a decision one way or the other--I can see both sides. Chroma Nebula  (talk)   16:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - It's a rejected draft. There is no need to bring rejected drafts to MFD, and rejected drafts should not be brought to MFD simply because they were rejected.  The purpose of rejection is to stop useless resubmissions without making extra work for MFD.  It isn't necessary to bring drafts to MFD simply because they needed rejecting.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Rejected drafts shouldn't go to MFD. They should either be allowed to develop or speedy deleted via G13. --WaltCip- (talk)  12:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That's what I thought too. I only took it here because it was (inappropriately) marked for speedy deletion and I didn't want to start an edit war over the issue, especially being a relatively new user. Chroma Nebula   (talk)   17:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It’s fine for you to detag a G11 tagging, but you should not do the XfD nomination. The original tagger should do the XfD.  Only they have the rationale. Your non-rationale is a misuse of mfd. MfD is not for “let’s make a decisions” cases.  If you want a discussion, use the talk page, and WP:3O, and other things listed at Publicising discussions. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay. I didn't realize that until after I had already posted here, but I'll know for next time. Chroma Nebula   (talk)   18:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The draft obviously needs work, such as more references, but otherwise I see no problem with it. I don't think it's overly promotional at all. J I P  &#124; Talk 00:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.