Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Quantum Holonomy Theory

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted as a copyright violation (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 20:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Quantum Holonomy Theory

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Someone (not me) wrote on WikiProject Mathematics/List of math draft pages: "some obscure primary sources, no significant secondary coverage; doesn't look wiki-notable". -- Beland (talk) 08:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * keep per WP:NDRAFT. Maybe if Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics had a guideline that this objectively failed, then MfD might delete it, but in general MfD is not for notability questions. Leave it for WP:G13. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. This draft is a copyvio - it's made entirely from paragraphs that have been copy pasted from various sites around the internet. there's a paragraph copied from here a paragraph copied from here  a paragraph copied from this reddit post  etc. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 11:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't have an strong opinion against deletion, but I think your argument doesn't hold as this is a mathematics/scientific theory and you should not author someone else's theory. in this case copy-paste is the right approach imo. Mim Armand (talk) 18:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * There are some serious papers about this ( 1 ), not sure who gets to validate how well-known should a scientific theory be before being wiki-notable, but I think it's good to have a place where experts can add/edit their thoughts.
 * That being said I don't have an strong opinion against deletion, I'm not an expert in the subject nor in Wikipedia policies, I was just researching the matter and thought Wikipedia should have a record of this subject.
 * Mim Armand (talk) 18:21, 11 March 2022 (UTC) mim
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.