Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Quincy Adams

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted WP:CSD by Vanjagenije. JohnCD (talk) 20:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Quincy Adams


Wikipedia is not a web host for fantasy versions of biggest loser Whpq (talk) 00:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - another correct application of WP:NOTWEBHOST. I love that people actually do this, though. A2soup (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. U5-able .  This sort of thing was one of the bigger justifications for U5.  I thought there was just a brief rush of these things, but clearly the problem is ongoing.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Draft space is not covered by U5, although it might qualify as a hoax. -- Whpq (talk) 04:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my mistake, not in userspace. I do think a D-criterion can be created to cover this.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Blank. Quincy Adams is a notable topic, no reason to delete. 21:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.122.119 (talk)
 * None of the material in the draft has anything to do with any Quincy Adams so it is utterly pointless to keep it in any form. --Whpq (talk) 22:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as has nothing to do with the title and nothing to do with any article. A misuse of draftspace. Legacypac (talk) 23:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: This should probably fall within hoax territory. And definitely hits U5 with the exception of it being outside of userspace. Perhaps U5 should be a G criterion? I don't think the sort of stuff properly falling within U5 belongs in any namespace. But I'm getting pretty far afield. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 01:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing acceptable at all. SwisterTwister   talk  06:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.