Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:RIEGL

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [express] || 06:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:RIEGL

 * – (View MfD)

5th time submission of advertising  DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - This hasn't been submitted in the past three months, but it is being tweaked, so that it won't expire, and needs to be shot instead. Five submissions without improvement is too many.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a burgeoning product in 2020 that does not yet meet WP:CORP, but might soon.  This is a reason for it to be worked in in draftspace.  There is promotion going on, it is not simply "advertising" but appears like that because there is no independent coverage of significant depth yet.  Better to block the resubmitter for disruptive resubmissions than to hide the edit history that shows the accounts that need to be watch with regards to promoting this burgeoning new product.
 * I see that the author has been notified, but the resubmitting culprit,  has not even been spoken to.  This is a bad procedural error. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete AfC doesn't need to be even more clogged with pages in which the page creator is not making good faith efforts to improve the page. Even if the topic is notable it would have to be wholly rewritten. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , you do know there's no such thing as a "strong delete" since it's not a vote? "Soft delete," "speedy delete," and "WP:SNOW delete," yes, as they each have special meanings. You can accentuate your bolded !vote with adjectives like "strong" and "weak," but what matters is the strength of your argument, not the adjective. Doug Mehus T · C  21:45, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm quite content with my current phrasing in AfD and MfD. Thanks for the suggestion though. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.