Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Race Winning Brands (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Race Winning Brands


Draft has been repeatedly declined. Another version of the draft was declined and evenually deleted Drafts on the subsidiary companies were all deleted. We've wasted enough time on this effort by a Single Purpose Account to push their business into Wikipedia. Legacypac (talk) 18:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - As declining AFC reviewer, I concur. As long as we are here, please pass the salt.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotion woefully failing WP:CORP. Also, the author is a WP:DUCK of a UPE’s throwaway SOCK.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * See article talkpage where a disclosure has been done. Legacypac (talk) 21:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Given [] I'm inclined to say AfC is done working to help paid editors make this mainspace ready for the company itself. I appreciate the disclosure anyway so at least we know what we are dealing with. Any editor is free to move drafts to mainspace. The company as a whole is likely notable given the range of brands, size, amd history of the brands. Let NPR process this. Legacypac (talk) 23:44, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.