Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ram subramanian

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Withdrawn by nominator.. (non-admin closure) — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 19:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Ram subramanian

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Appears to be a hoax. The vast majority of the sources here (down to the misleadingly labeled IMDB link at the bottom of the page) are about a man named "Mahesh Bhatt". — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 15:03, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Not a hoax: The editor had copied content from Mahesh Bhatt probably to write his draft within an established layout for a director. I have removed the leftover unattributed copied portions, and what is left is just an unsourced biography. —Alalch E. 16:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I am preparing my own content for Ram subramanian, which takes some time, I never submitted edited copy to review Hemantpateria (talk) 14:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * SEVEN MINUTES after the draft is created, it goes straight to MfD? Give me a break! Keep per WP:NDRAFT. --⛵ WaltClipper - (talk)  17:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep unsourced biography draft as having been nominated too soon, and as not being critically bad with respect to BLP so that it would warrant deletion. —Alalch E. 17:19, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Let the submission for review and iterative review process take its course. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - No need to delete from draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Back when I reviewed article CSD's. we called tagging like this "WP:HASTY deletion tagging". There is no need to rush into deleting a non-promotional draft that is still a work in progress. Creator had not submitted for review and was clearly using another page as a model/template around which to build this article.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.