Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ranju Hazarika

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Null, page was already deleted. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥) (please reply using &#x7B;&#x7B;ping&#x7D;&#x7D;) 02:08, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Ranju Hazarika


Draft duplicates existing article Kumud Chandra Hazarika and contains only extensive bibliographic listing. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  14:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. such duplicates are normally deleted via G6.  DGG ( talk ) 20:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, I'll keep that in mind in the future. I was having a hard time figuring out what deletion process to use. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  20:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Are they? At WT:CSD, there was a thumping rejection of the notion that CSD#A10 could be applied to draftspace drafts, so you just apply G6 instead?  When you G6 a draftspace duplicate, do you take care to explain the situation of the material already existing in mainspace in the log, or on the authhor's talk page?  Redirecting draftspace duplications to the mainspace article makes a lot more sense.   Proposed seriously at Wikipedia_talk:Drafts.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.