Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Recurrence relations integration function

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The SandDoctor Talk 23:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Recurrence relations integration function


Found by the Math Wikiproject to be "self promotion of psudo mathematics" aka junk pile Legacypac (talk) 19:51, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Abreu (and Abreu logged out) are the authors, and are primarily citing Abreu. This appears to be original research that makes grandiose claims, and is therefore probably flawed, but we don't need an academic peer-review process to identify the flaws, because no original research, whether valid or invalid, is the policy.  Therefore:
 * Delete - Robert McClenon (talk) 22:40, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Advertised at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * that's fine but see the diff in my nom where is was assessed as junk by User:XOR'easter reviewing math drafts on the math draft list. Legacypac (talk) 07:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, missed that. Delete per  User:XOR'easter.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Unremarkable self-promotion. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 14:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per math project judgment Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.