Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Remote Neural Monitoring

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete and send mental signals to indicate it should not be recreated. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Remote Neural Monitoring


Fails WP:V. Draft that is clearly an essay intended to promote patently fringe theories based entirely on WP:OR and unreliable sources. This is not salvageable. See also WP:BOLLOCKS. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Yeah... in some way we might be doing the author a favor to delete this, since it might me they won't spend/waste any more time on it. Best case scenario is there's something eventually (because there isn't now) which could be usefully merged into Telepathy, Thought identification, or Brain-reading. But that's the best case scenario.  G M G  talk  19:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete a good case for extending U5 to cover Draft space. Legacypac (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Entirely outside WP:PG and not likely to get back there anytime soon. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, based simply on the set of unreliable sources being used, the rest of the nomination statement is probably true too. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete in favour of Electronic harassment. DraftSpace must not be used for WP:POVFORKing.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Question - is this so fringe that no one bothers to debunk it? I ask because, IF there are debunkers, it may be notable enough for an article (although one very different from the current draft) - even though the topic is complete nonsense (there is such a thing as notable fringe). Blueboar (talk) 22:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes this actually is notably fringe and we have a proper (as in not wrapped in tin foil) article on the subject. See Electronic harassment. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * (ec) I was going to mention this is essentially a gonzo WP:POVFORK of electronic harassment. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Portions are incomprehensible, and the whole thing is fringe of fringe. Reasons for deletion include original research, fringe theories, incomprehensibility, unfixability, etc.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Can't we just let them know this is not seful content by sending menral signals? Legacypac (talk) 06:58, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete bollocks. Roxy, the dog. barcus 15:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.