Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Researchfish

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. I'm okay with an experienced editor taking a crack at this. Primefac (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Researchfish


Ten declines in the last year. I don't think I've ever seen that many. Time to put this out of its misery. Primefac (talk) 16:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think there is a  reasonable chance of finding references, and I do not at all think it is in any sense an advertisement or promotion. The only problem is, like with many drafts, nobody appropriate has worked on it. I intend to.  DGG ( talk ) 22:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as DGG has stated above that they intend to work on it. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.