Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Richard Keatley

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:23, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Keatley

 * North America1000 20:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * North America1000 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * North America1000 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Resubmitted 2 times with no convincing changes so there's nothing to accept in both our standards and policies, which say enough. SwisterTwister  talk  05:07, 19 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 20:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. The promotional tone could be fixed, but lacks substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources, offered or to be found. Looks unlikely to qualify on academic notability grounds. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.