Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Riley Knight

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 12:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Riley Knight


Redundant draft article and main article has now been created at Riley Knight. Flickerd (talk) 10:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Histmerge needed? The draft predates the mainspace article, but also has all the hallmarks of being copied from something in mainspace itself (has cats and a full-blown infobox). I suppose it's possible the IP just took the framework from someplace else, but I'm just not sure. I think some further investigation is needed before we can say for sure. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 07:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, hmm. So I think what happened is the IP took the article framework from someplace else: When created in July 2015 it had and  at the top. But it actually didn't have cats in the initial edit. So I think if we can verify that the mainspace version wasn't copied-and-pasted from draftspace, we can safely delete this without needing a histmerge. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 07:51, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The histories aren't connected and I don't think a history merge is needed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:31, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, WP:UP applies. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.