Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Robert Wynne-Simmons

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:23, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Wynne-Simmons


Autobio that reads like a resume. I doubt this person will be able to make this NPOV enough. Already decline 4 times at AfC Legacypac (talk) 07:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep  WP:SK#1. Nominator fails to give a valid reason for deletion.  “Reads like” problems can be fixed.  NPOV problems can be fixed.  Multiple submission-decline cycles is an AfC process problem.  Plausibly notable. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - "Reads like" problems can be fixed, but being an autobiography cannot be fixed unless a neutral editor will blow it up and start over. Is there a neutral editor here who is willing to work on this?  Unless there is a response,
 * Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 16:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Being an autobiography can be fixed by the work of other editors, but is not, in any case, a valid reason for deletion. It is rare for a person to be able to write about him- or herself and comply with WP:NPOV, but not unheard of. It is not so rare for a draft or even an article to start as an autobio but be edited into a valid article. No need to start over, this draft provides a useful and valid starting point. The subject looks probably notable, although lack of notability would not be a valid deletion reason at the draft stage, nor should it be. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment. Without checking this in detail, the problem is he's probably notable. And he's upfront with his user name. Until the community decides autobiography is unacceptable... Espresso Addict (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Anyone is free to mainspace it anytime - and if this closes keep I might just mainspace it myself to expose it to more editors willing to help Mr Wayne-Simmons get his page up to standards. Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As the creator is autoconfirmed there seems no reason why he should not move it into mainspace himself. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.