Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rockstar Games

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Rockstar Games

 * – (View MfD)

Why do we need this? It' just a Spanish-language version of Rockstar Games' background. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 17:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete this has been a stale draft since 2019, only kept alive by some renaming by AFC editors/reviewers. Even if translated, this would end up being a content fork for the existing article. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - We don't need old leftover non-English stuff in draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Because we are the English encyclopedia, and we do not need forks. Perhaps we may need a Spork however. Lightburst (talk) 21:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * What's with the language xenophobia? Translating articles between different language Wikipedias is one of the biggest Wikipedia tasks remaining.  A huge amount of information is on en.wikipedia.org only and is to be translated to foreign language Wikipedias.  Also, foreign language Wikipedias have information to be translated to brought to en.wikipedia.org.  En.wikipedia being the biggest makes it the most suitable to be the default host for all translating.  Material being in another language is not a reason to delete.  I would advise Wikipedians doing translations to use userspace, not draftspace, but their use of draftspace should not be punished by deletion.
 * When this draft is old and redundant, G13 will take care of it. Gnomes postponing the G13 deletion are not a problem.  This is encyclopedic material and is not the offensive material that motivated the creation of G13.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you're treating it as G13, then dated in 25 December 2019 by  would be the last time someone worked on the article before  attempted to speedy delete, which was undone multiple times and King Work's account was blocked for other reasons.  AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, treat it like G13. No rush.  6 months, 18 months, no difference.  The author gets a note, and it’s an automatic WP:REFUND. Do not criticise cross-Wikipedia translations.  Exactly what was going on here is unclear, the author account has no global contributions, and none here of interest, but language is not the problem. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Rockstar games per WP:SRED. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 12:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:G13 and WP:IAR. The only edits in the last six months were a cleanup move in April and the aforementioned vandalism by King Work, who is now blocked as a sockpuppet. Per WP:DENY and WP:BMB, it would make sense to ignore the vandalizing edits and consider the G13 clock to have started on either December 25, 2019‎ or April 9, 2020‎, depending on whether you personally consider the page move an "edit" or not. Even if you do, that would mean that the page would be G13 eligible on October 9, 2020, which is five days from when I'm writing this, and just a few days after this MfD would become eligible to be closed. That seems like the most logical decision to me, unless everyone thinks would be preferable to just redirect it to Rockstar Games. Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey I'm a new user, but you can delete the page even though its for Spanish. That draft is an re copy from an articleBryson Johnson (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.