Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Roki Vulović

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Roki Vulović


Much as I'd like to see this page on the wiki, multiple AfD discussions have shown that the subject of the article fails notability, even after searches for sources, and possibly verifiability. Therefore, this draft if moved into mainspace would meet the same fate. If anyone can find sources/rationale to keep this subject on the wiki, I would love to be proven wrong. --PrussianOwl (talk) 05:08, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the clear consensus of Articles for deletion/Rodoljub Vulović (3rd nomination). Interested editors should consider improving the still unsourced cs:Rodoljub Roki Vulović or ru:Вулович, Родолюб, which would be deleted at en.wikipedia as PROMOTION with no reliable sources.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:06, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nom and SmokeyJoe. This draft is useless and never going to constructively enter main space. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:37, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt - Three AFDs is more than enough. I will note that User:SmokeyJoe has a strict standard for deletion of drafts (is tolerant of marginal drafts) and will concur with his reasoning.  Some of the editors at the AFDs recommended Salt.  Salt with ECP in both draft and article space to permit an experienced neutral editor to write an article if appropriate.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * MfD doesn’t examine notability, but if AfD *already* has deleted it, with a clear consensus, and the draft shows no sign of overcoming the AfD reasons for deletion, then the AfD should be respected.  Counterintuitively, the number of AfDs does not increase the case for deletion as multi AfDs may mean unclear AfD consensus. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.