Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rortos Flight Engine

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rortos Flight Engine


I tagged this as A7 in April and it was deleted as such, and then recreated. Per a conversation with the page creator on my talk page, I moved the recreation to draft space so they could attempt to improve it through the AfC process. Its been declined four times already, and was just submitted a fifth time without any changes since the last draft. Since at this point it is unlikely that the draft will meet our inclusion criteria, I think deletion is best. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I just declined it again -- it was re-submitted with no changes since the previous decline.  Frankly, this draft might be speedy-able for being little more than an advertisement for its products.  But it also fails to demonstrate notability.  My own searches turned up no significant coverage of the company.  Such hits as I did find were to product announcements and software-download sites.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.