Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rycon

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy deleted WP:G3 and WP:G11 by. (non-admin closure) ミラP 12:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Rycon

 * – (View MfD)

Not a plausable draft. Wikipedia is not a fanfiction host. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 15:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR, but since it's the plausible draft of a short story, recommend that we allow WP:REFUND to apply so the user can be either (a) e-mailed a copy of the short story or (b) have it userified into his or her userspace. --Doug Mehus T · C  16:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * There should be no problem with emailing the content to the user, if requested, . but this does not belong in userspece either. Indeed if moved or recreated there, would probably be subject to U5 speedy deletion. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , So even if the closer closes as "delete" without noting WP:REFUND, if the editor makes an undeletion request, the processing administrator has discretion to e-mail it to the user (without userification)? --Doug Mehus T · C  22:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , yes, unless it was a copyright infringement, or an attack page or other BLP violation. Most admins would not email blatant vandalism or hoax pages, either. But something like this, or a non-notable autobio, or even a rather promotional draft, why not. If requested politely, at least. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:37, 23 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete not a plausible article, no prejudice against a refund per above. e-mail a copy to the user on request. 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 16:19, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. NOTWEBHOST. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no plausible way this could become a valid narricle. if moved to mainspace, would be speedy deletable as something made up by the author (A11 IIRC), and unless published and reveiwed, that would be true no matter how much it was improved. And if it were published, would need a near total rewrite as per WP:PLOT. As SmokeyJoe says, a NOTWEBHOST violation. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.