Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:SJL (web series)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:SJL (web series)


In the case of the SJL and Haylor drafts, these have not been submitted for approval since October 2016 yet the sole author continues to add to them regularly. I have left a notice on their talk page asking what their intention is for the drafts, but have not had a reply after 11 days. They have edited in that time. My belief is that they are using Wikipedia as a webhost. Not that MFD is for notability issues but there's no chance that these articles will be accepted into mainspace given the paltry number of subscribers to the respective YouTube channels (41 subscribers for stevenpanameno and 74 subscribers for Haylor). Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Article creator has just been blocked for continual disruption and WP:NOTHERE.  That block speaks volumes in regard to the creation of these articles.  Also fails WP:GNG from what I can tell with a cursory review. -- ψλ  ● ✉ ✓ 19:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Given the creator has been indeffed these aren't likely to amount to anything, particularly given the fact that there is zero chance of surviving in mainspace here. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 19:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is just advertising/SEO link building without a valid claim to notability. Legacypac (talk) 21:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. The subject is extremely unlikely to ever develop into anything that could survive a mainspace review - had these been anywhere other than draft space, they would have already been speedy deleted. Also, given the indef block of the user involved for NOTHERE behavior, these should just be cleaned out as well. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:57, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.