Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:SWS BY H-Y

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. AGK &#9632;   21:44, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:SWS BY H-Y


Draft for promotion of new non notable company. Previously deleted for overt promotion and now after thorough search I believe this has no prospect of ever becoming meaningful encyclopedic article. –Ammarpad (talk) 13:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - It isn't being resubmitted, but will never be an article. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:50, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD and because it should be allowed the mercy of G13. No need to discuss pages like this here. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 04:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep it exactly for what? for it to wait for process wonkishness and be deleted by g13 or to be improved? Draft space is not for indefinite hosting and what is evident that cannot become proper article can be nominated at any time without waiting for bureaucratic time span. In either case, it further shows why this junk should be deleted. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I do not consider waiting on G13 to be process "wonkishness" but rather something that functionally lightens the community's burden by avoiding full discussions like this. That aside, the draftspace is designed as a place for things waiting for improvement. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 12:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not the G13 that's wonkishness here, but rather using G13 as a defense to host junk material. It is not burden on anyone per VOLUNTEER, everyone has absolute right to burden or not burden themselves. But nobody is being burdened against their wish.–Ammarpad (talk) 13:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Creating pointless work (i.e. these nominations) is not justifiable by VOLUNTEER; speedy deletion criteria exist so that discussion is unnecessary. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 17:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. the virtue of deleting something here is that it prevents automatic restoration on request.   DGG ( talk ) 20:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.