Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Saath Charitable Trust

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Saath Charitable Trust

 * – (View MfD)

Delete, author is keen to write promotional articles, multiple re-submissions, no improvements Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete entirely promotional, and undeclared paid editing too. Theroadislong (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I asked and they state they are 17 and writing for a school project. They are trying to make significant changes to the article, the next will be critical because without GNG satisfied the draft will go nowhere. In fairness I started this before they denied paid editing and I was trying to AGF there. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Without wishing to out anyone, a quick Google search, shows a definite conflict of interest between Mayank and Saath Charitable Trust, but that could be a coincidence. Theroadislong (talk) 16:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Enough there for WP:QUACK. I also can't ever imagine a scenario in which a 17 year old would choose to write about a charitable trust for a school project lol. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:48, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete No matter whether the UPE concerns can be fully substantiated or not, the fact is it is overly promotional and a very problematic AfC article that needs to be done away with. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nominator. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 23:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Submitted 8 times, which is absurdly excessive, and declined by 6 different reviewers (including myself and 3 other !voters). Robert McClenon (talk) 07:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, just wasting time being re-submitted. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - I find the claim by the author that they are being assigned to write about a charitable organization for school to be entirely believable. We have seen too many cases where students have been stupidly and cluelessly assigned projects involving Wikipedia in which they are required to get the article accepted.  The student ends up begging and pleading with the reviewers to accept the draft so that they can pass the course.  It may be that the student only thinks that they are required to get the draft accepted, and that the student misunderstands the course.  It may be that the instructor is giving an assignment that misuses Wikipedia.  It may really be WP:undisclosed paid editing, but it might be academic stupidity.  It really may be academic stupidity.  But enough is enough, and submitting the draft 8 times is too much.  It really may be a stupid assignment.  No change to my !vote.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.