Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sabnam Pervin (actress)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: History merge. — xaosflux  Talk 16:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Sabnam Pervin (actress)


Already in article space as Sabnam Parvin (which is the correct case). Either the article should be kept or the article should be deleted, but we don't need this draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * History merge with Sabnam Parvin. "Already" is a wrong, misleading, word choice.  The article followed.  Articles do not have to pass though AfC or draftspace, new editors may write new articles directly into mainspace.  Anyone is free to nominate the article at AfD, but the editor shouldn't be punished for disagreeing with reviewers.  I don't particularly like these rules.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:47, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - Deleting a draft isn't meant to punish the author, but to eliminate cruft. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:48, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * History merge There were edits to the draft by other users that were part of the text that was cut-and-paste moved to the mainspace article. That always creates a potential copyright problem – though it's not always borne out if the edits by others were not sufficiently creative to require attribution. Nevertheless, doing a history merge here (and of course avoiding cut and paste moves in the first place), takes care of any potential attribution problem without the need for any dive into the sometimes thorny question of whether there was or was not sufficient creative content added to make the content, without the history attached, an infringement under our licenses.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.