Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Closing a little early per WP:SNOW and the possible WP:GAMINGTHESYSTEM with the G7 request. Will also be salting, given the history. Hog Farm Talk 19:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Sanjeev Bhanot

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted without much effort at improving it, with a promotional bent as well. The author has even gone so far as to remove declines. —A little blue Bori v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 08:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Robert McClenon (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator:
 * This page has been declined 6 times and rejected 3 times, which is more than enough to justify deletion.
 * The submitter has attempted to remove the record of the declines.
 * Enough is enough, and too much is too much.
 * SALT
 * Comment The original author and primary contributor has now also asked for deletion here. I would have tagged A7 G7 but think it would be valuable for this discussion gain consensus and prevent them from just trying to start over again from a "clean slate". McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Unless I've misread the CSD criteria A7 doesn't apply here as this is a draft. —A little blue Bori  v^_^v  Jéské Couriano 19:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Author could request CSD although not A7, I think they meant G7, if they're the original author, but I suspect it is being done because they want to start it over without the record of declines and rejections. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that it is G7 rather than A7, and I agree that they are probably trying to erase the record. What is important is to close this MFD with a decision to delete.  It doesn't matter whether that is done early, or after 7 days.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah that was my bad I meant G7. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT declined several times then rejected several times and continues to resubmit. This is now disruptive.McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as promotional and tendentiously resubmitted despite declines and rejections. Enough is enough. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt we need a new CSD category: "Declined by an AFC reviewer with the message stop more than two times".--- Possibly (talk) 21:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NMFD as tendentiously resubmitted, turned away 9 times with a total of 6 declines and 3 rejections. This will never become an article and it's time for this to go. Given the history here ECP SALT makes sense, but I'll leave that to the closing admins discretion. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 03:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.